Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Welcome To Travel Swami!

Welcome to Travel Swami , like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information. Take advantage of it immediately!
Whats more you can use your Facebook or Twitter account to Sign In


  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Add events to our community calendar
  • Get your own profile and make new friends
  • Customize your experience here

Polarizing Filter


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 cyberhippie

cyberhippie

    Senior Guru Member

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,275 posts

Posted 10 February 2008 - 06:49 AM

In a quest for those wonderfully dark and vivid mountain skies, I bought myself a polarizing filter today. A bit of a shock to the wallet but never mind if I get the colours, I want it will have been worth it!!

Does anyone know how much a UV filter will set me back in India say in Mumbai.

#2 Hyderabadi

Hyderabadi

    Guru Member

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,560 posts

Posted 10 February 2008 - 07:30 AM

You will get some filters dirt cheap in India. But the quality...

Anyways, in the digital age, I prefer the easy way:

No filter 'RAW image':
Posted Image

Minimal editing in Picasa, with a 'polarizer' kind of effect:
Posted Image
Sekhar

_____________

Fotos on flickr


#3 cyberhippie

cyberhippie

    Senior Guru Member

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,275 posts

Posted 10 February 2008 - 07:39 AM

Th UV filter is more for lense protection than anything else Hyderabadi, so cheap will be fine. Nice effect, photomatix achieves a similar result.
I just want to get a "live shot" Then I can see what I've got there and then.

I'll give it a test run tomorrow.

#4 Hyderabadi

Hyderabadi

    Guru Member

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,560 posts

Posted 10 February 2008 - 08:04 AM

Ah, the UV filters. they are cheap anywhere.

I even wonder if they do anything at all, like you say other than simply protect the lense, just a placebo effect, most times imho. ;)

I've never found any differene, with or wihout.

OTOH, there are some pictures taken with that Zenit where a filter did make a real difference.

In my Dad's time, when he bought that Minolta (have it properly stored in Hyderabad btw) in 1969, he also bought some filters  (yellow, orange, etc.) for B&W photography.

I find that feature 'digitally' in Picasa! ;)
Sekhar

_____________

Fotos on flickr


#5 Hyderabadi

Hyderabadi

    Guru Member

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,560 posts

Posted 10 February 2008 - 08:25 AM

Photomatix needs to be applied differently.. you need to take atleast 3 different 'bracketed' shots to start with. ;)
Sekhar

_____________

Fotos on flickr


#6 cyberhippie

cyberhippie

    Senior Guru Member

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,275 posts

Posted 10 February 2008 - 08:44 AM

Being a crap photographer I always shoot bracketed with my Digi SLR, it seems to work for me. Fiddling with the white balance options and ISO also produces good results for a born amateur such as myself.

I can't wait to use it in India, I managed 2300 shots on a 5 week visit to Scotland, 4 months in India.........I better buy some more memory cards.  ;) ;)

#7 Hyderabadi

Hyderabadi

    Guru Member

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,560 posts

Posted 10 February 2008 - 08:58 AM

Compared to Jorge and others, we are complete crap-shooting-amatuers!  ;)

I remember the time back in the 70's when my Dad's camera was a 'photocopy machine'.

They used to stick these college certificates etc., on the wall, take pictures and file them along with their resume, typed up on a centuries old typewriter...! ;)

What lenses have you bought?
Sekhar

_____________

Fotos on flickr


#8 cyberhippie

cyberhippie

    Senior Guru Member

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,275 posts

Posted 10 February 2008 - 09:05 AM

Just the one, a Tamron AF28-300mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di

Seems like a good multipurpose lense, as I don't want to carry loads of stuff around with me.

Saved about 200 dollars on the this, as it was wrongly priced in the media store where I bought it, to my surprise they honored the listed price, saving me 150 Euros!!

#9 cyberhippie

cyberhippie

    Senior Guru Member

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,275 posts

Posted 10 February 2008 - 09:07 AM

It struck me that a tele convertor might be a good travel tool and not so expensive really??

#10 Hyderabadi

Hyderabadi

    Guru Member

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,560 posts

Posted 10 February 2008 - 09:35 AM

Nah, just stick with your 28-300 Tamron. My experience atleast.  

I have a http://www.tamron.co.../18200_diII.asp which I keep on mostly.  The more you zoom, greater the chance of a blurred picture. Unless you buy a tripod and a remote.

I also have a  Canon 28 - 135 http://www.usa.canon...mp;modelid=7337 for low light stuff.

It's a great hobby, but it can also make you go broke, is all the advice I can offer.  ;)
Sekhar

_____________

Fotos on flickr